Thursday, February 28, 2008

dear faculty and staff

DEAR MR CHO

WHILE I AGREE WITH YOU ON THE TENOR OF YOUR MESSAGE CONTENT, I
DISCUSSED WITH YOU THE CONCERNS OF OUR UNION BUILDING COMMITTEE UNDER
OUR CONTRACT ARTICLES THE NEED TO BE PROVIDED SPECIFIC INFORMATION
REGARDING PROGRAMMING. POLICIES, TIMELINES AND OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
WE ARE OBLIGATED TO REVIEW TO INSURE OUR MEMBERS RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED.

THE SPECIFIC PROPOSALS AND REQUIREMENTS OF EACH OF THE THREE RINGS YOU
DESCRIBE NEED TO BE PRESENTED TO OUR UNION BUILDING TO REVIEW AND
PRESENT TO OUR MEMBERS, AS WELL AS NEED TO BE PRESENTED TO THE SSC TO
REVIEW AND DECIDE UPON AT OUR MARCH 11, 2008 MEETING.

WHILE I APPRECIATE YOUR CONCERN WITH THE DEADLINES TO MEET THESE
PROPOSED OBLIGATIONS YOU HAVE DISCUSSED,YOU MUST ALSO RECOGNIZE OUR
CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS/RESPONSIBILITIES AND THE PROCEDURES EMBEDDED WITHIN
SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL LAWS ,WHICH REQUIRE THIS IN DEPTH REVIEW AND
APPROVAL BY THE SCC BEFORE IT IS APPROVED BY OUR SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL
FOR 2008-2009.

WE NEED TO ADHERE TO THESE REQUIREMENTS TO INSURE EACH PROPOSAL IS
FULLY STUDIED AND DISCUSSED AS WELL AS DECIDED UPON THROUGH THE
REQUIRED SHARED DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES DESCRIBED BY OUR CONTRACT
AND SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL LAWS AND APPROVED BYLAWS, TO INSURE THEY ARE
RESOLVED IN THE APPROPRIATE MANNER WHICH INSURES THEIR LEGALITY.

SINCERELY,
JAMES A. GALGANO
UESF LOCAL 61 BUILDING REPRESENTATIVE


dear uesf local 61 members

last week the ssc budget and site plan committees were provided and
introduction to possible funding from the avid and gear up programs. at
those two meetings the principal stated before we would move forward on
these programs , we would need total buy in from faculty and staff and
the school community. questions regarding specifics and requirements
for our site and faculty/staff were never spelled out with requested
specifics. the areA of the coordinators were questioned to insure they
would not become another layer of teacher requirements, meetings and
additional management oversight into what we all believe our students
need to be successful learners.

at our current ongoing ssc site plan committee meetings students,
parents, faculty and staff have been writing a site plan , which we
believe more effectively empowers parents and students ,and through the
shared decision making process provides teachers through grade level
and department teams to address the immediate needs and abilities of
our students to meet the rigorous academic requirements they now must
meet. at this time we have had no conversation through the ubc/adm
about these principal proposed programs and the policies, staffing and
timeline requirements within our contract, nor has the ssc been
provided with the specifics of these programs that would warrant our
needlessly approving them without knowing the full facts and what this
will entail for our students, faculty and staff. the ssc has not even
been provided information about this program at a regularly scheduled
ssc meeting to even consider whether it is appropriate or meets the
needs of our school site to meet our academic goals.

as those veteran teachers who remain at this site remember, over seven
years ago our site was volunteered to be apart of a reading program
that would supposedly bring in approximately 100,000 to our site. the
result was the carbo reading program which was poorly instituted,
funded and for which faculty never received the training nor supplies
to make it successful. the result was our reading scores dropped and
our site came under state sanction which lead to three years of daily
meetings and painful paperwork requirements which took four years to
turn around. therefore we must beware of "greeks bearing gifts" and be
very careful what we agree to sign on to. this is not to say these
programs will not help our site, but we should not be rushed into
accepting these programs without fully knowing the specifics and
requirements of each.

until we receive the full information regarding these programs please
be careful and cautious about what is being offered or what you are
being asked to sign on to do. the future of our school site and the
safety and well being of our student population deserves a more
thoughtful review and investigation into each of these programs before
we make our decision as faculty and staff , as ubc/adm and as school
site community through the school site council. anything else may
possibly lead to a future we may soon regrat.

please request to see all the information and requirements and through
grade level, department level teams, through the ubc and through the
ubc/adm and finally the school site council after all facts are known
then and only then make a decision.

sincerely,
james a. galgano
uesf local 61 building representative

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

dear faculty and staff

dear uesf local 61 members

last week the ssc budget and site plan committees were provided and
introduction to possible funding from the avid and gear up programs. at
those two meetings the principal stated before we would move forward on
these programs , we would need total buy in from faculty and staff and
the school community. questions regarding specifics and requirements
for our site and faculty/staff were never spelled out with requested
specifics. the areA of the coordinators were questioned to insure they
would not become another layer of teacher requirements, meetings and
additional management oversight into what we all believe our students
need to be successful learners.

at our current ongoing ssc site plan committee meetings students,
parents, faculty and staff have been writing a site plan , which we
believe more effectively empowers parents and students ,and through the
shared decision making process provides teachers through grade level
and department teams to address the immediate needs and abilities of
our students to meet the rigorous academic requirements they now must
meet. at this time we have had no conversation through the ubc/adm
about these principal proposed programs and the policies, staffing and
timeline requirements within our contract, nor has the ssc been
provided with the specifics of these programs that would warrant our
needlessly approving them without knowing the full facts and what this
will entail for our students, faculty and staff. the ssc has not even
been provided information about this program at a regularly scheduled
ssc meeting to even consider whether it is appropriate or meets the
needs of our school site to meet our academic goals.

as those veteran teachers who remain at this site remember, over seven
years ago our site was volunteered to be apart of a reading program
that would supposedly bring in approximately 100,000 to our site. the
result was the carbo reading program which was poorly instituted,
funded and for which faculty never received the training nor supplies
to make it successful. the result was our reading scores dropped and
our site came under state sanction which lead to three years of daily
meetings and painful paperwork requirements which took four years to
turn around. therefore we must beware of "greeks bearing gifts" and be
very careful what we agree to sign on to. this is not to say these
programs will not help our site, but we should not be rushed into
accepting these programs without fully knowing the specifics and
requirements of each.

until we receive the full information regarding these programs please
be careful and cautious about what is being offered or what you are
being asked to sign on to do. the future of our school site and the
safety and well being of our student population deserves a more
thoughtful review and investigation into each of these programs before
we make our decision as faculty and staff , as ubc/adm and as school
site community through the school site council. anything else may
possibly lead to a future we may soon regrat.

please request to see all the information and requirements and through
grade level, department level teams, through the ubc and through the
ubc/adm and finally the school site council after all facts are known
then and only then make a decision.

sincerely,
james a. galgano
uesf local 61 building representative

Friday, February 22, 2008

UESF LOCAL 61 UNION BUILDING COMMITTEE POTLUCK MEETING WITH ALLAN BRILL FIELD REPRESENTATIVE....PLEASE BRING SOMETHING TO SHARE AND ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE

UESF LOCAL 61 UNION BUILDING COMMITTEE MEETING
FEBRUARY 25TH, 2008 AT 12:10PM IN THE LIBRARY
POTLUCK MEETING PLEASE BRING SOMETHING TO SHARE WITH OTHERS

ALLAN BRILL : OUR UESF LOCAL 61 FIELD REPRESENTATIVE WILL BE ON HAND
TO DISCUSS AND ANSWER QUESTIONS REGARDING THE FOLLOWING AREAS:
A. RAINY DAY FUND
B. PARCEL TAX PROPOSAL
C. LAYOFF NOTICES PROCEDURES/UESF SUPPORT
D. UESF/SFUSD MEMO OF UNDERSTANDING AGREEMENTS
E. MEMBERSHIP PAST AND CURRENT CONCERNS

PLEASE ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THIS VERY IMPORTANT MEETING

WELCOME TO MS JENNFER HOFFMAN : OUR NEW STAR SITE SUBSTITUTE TEACHER

UBC MEETING 2/19/08 SUMMARY OF MEETING
UESF LOCAL 61 SITE MEMBERS ATTENDING/PARTICIPATING-24 MEMBERS THANK YOU
FOR ATTENDING AND PARTICPATING
UESF LOCAL 61 UBC REPRESENTATIVES AND ALTERNATES PARTICIPATING UBC
REPRESENTATIVES
A.BROWN, J.GERBER,M.MCCACHREN,D.BRYSON,D.WILLIAMS, C.MALTBY, L.WOOTEN,
L.SCHUCKNECHT, J.GALGANO
PARTICIPATING UBC ALTERNATES: L.SPEARS, A.D.REYNOLDS, V.GONZALEZ

SINCERE THANKS TO MS MALTBY FOR CONTINUED OUTSTANDING RECORD OF OUR UBC
MEETINGS . YOU ARE THE GREATEST!!!!!

MIDDLE SCHOOL UNION MEETING UPDATE:
MS GERBER, M.MCCACHREN, J.GALGANO:
PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSIONÉÉ.
· CONCERNS OVER ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT VIEW CPT TIME SHOULD BE FILLED
WITH MEETINGS
· IF SFUSD CONTINUES TO MOVE ON THIS WE WILL NEED TO MOVE TO WORK TO
RULE TO PROTECT OUR MEMBERSHIP RIGHTS NEXT YEAR.
· OUR UBC HAS THE ABILTIY UNDER CONTRACT TO REDUCE THE TIMES OF THESE
CPT MEETINGS TO 15 MINUTES IF THIS OCCURS.
· MR RUIZ VENN DIAGRAM OF UBC RIGHTS AND COERCION OF MEMBERS TO
PARTICIPATE IN MISTLI WILL PROVOKE SITE PARITCICIPATION TO DISAPPEAR.
· MANY CURRENT PARTICIAPNTS EXPRESSED CONCERNS ABOUT THE GROWING NUMBER
OF REQUIREMENTS OF MISTLI WHICH TAKES AWAY FROM MEEING THE NEEDS OF OUR
DIVERSE STUDENT POPULATION.
· MEMBERS EXPRESSED THE ADMÕS CREATION OF A SHADOW REPRESENTATIVE BODY
THROUGH THE APPOINTMENT OF A LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE AND GRADE LEVEL
REPRESENTATIVES WHO ARE COMPENSATED FOR PROMOTING ADM AIMS. SEEN AS
DIRECT VIOLATION OF CONTRACT ARTICLES REGARDING THE ELECTED ROLE OF THE
UBC. THIS COULD ALSO LEAD TO WORK TO RULE IF IT CONTINUES ON ITS
CURRENT PATH DESCRIBED THROUGH PRINCIPAL COMMUNICATIONS TO
FACULTY/STAFF.
· RAINY DAY FUND HAS BEEN APPROVED BY CITY DUE TO CUTBACKS AND
APPROXIMATELY 500 LAY OFF NOTICES WHICH WILL BE MAILED OUT. THE UESF
WILL ASSIST MEMBERS THROUGH THIS PROCESS TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF ALL
MEMBERS. FUND WILL HELP OFFSET ANY PROPOSEDGOVERNOR PROPOSED CUTBACKS
WHICH MUST GO THROUGH THE DEMOCRATIC CONTROLLED ASSEMBLY. ALL MEMBERS
WERE ENCOURAGED TO WRITE THEIR REPRESENTATIVES TO PROTECT EDUCATION
FROM THE GOVERNORS PROPOSED CUTBACKS.
· PARCEL TAX AND SFUSD/UESF MEMO OF UNDERSTANDING READ AND DISCUSSED
· MANY MEMBERS EXPRESSED THEIR CONCERNS TO THE DESCRIBED ACCOUNTABILTY
REQUIREMENTS THROUGH THE PAR PROGRAM. MEMBERS WHO KNOW MEMBERS WHO HAVE
GONE THROUGH THIS PROCESS STATED IT APPEARED TO TARGET VETERAN TEACHERS
EVALUATING THEM THROUGH REQUIEMENTS THE WOULD BE UNABLE TO MEET.
· THE BTSA PROGRAM WAS SEEN AS A MORE SUPPORTIVE PROGRAM TO ASSIST
MEMBERS, WHICH THE PAR PROGRAM IS NOT MEETING.
· MEMBERS WERE PROVIDED WITH INFORMATION OF PREVIOUSLY RATED
OUTSTANDING AND HIGHLY SATISFACTORY TEACHERS WHO HAVE COME UNDER THE
PAR MICROSCOPE WITH SERIOUS RESULTS.
· J.GERBER: PAR CHECKLIST OF 75 REQUIREMENTS HAD BEEN USED TO PLACE A
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHER ON THE PATH OF DISMISSAL FOR NOT MEETING THESE
DRACONIAN REQUIREMENTS. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE MEMBERS AGREED. SEEN AS
AN ATTACK ON VETERAN TEACHERS PERCEIVED BY THE DISTRICT AS NOT BEING
COST EFFECTIVE.
· A. REYNOLDS : THIS IS AN UNFORTUNATE WAY TO DEAL WITH VETERAN
TEACHERS AND WILL CREATE CONCERNS THROUGHOUT SCHOOL SITES.
· M.MCACCHREN:CINCERNED WHY THIS IS BEING DONE AT OUR DISTRICT WHEN
OTHER TEACHERS HE KNOWS AT OTHER DISTRICTS ARE NOT EXPERIENCING THE
SAME.
· UBC/MEMBERSHIP VOTE:
· UNANIMOUS SUPPORT FOR PARCEL TAX PROPOSAL
· UNANIMOUS OPPOSITION TO ACCOUNTABILTY REQUIREMENTS PROPOSAL.
· UNANIMOUS OPPOSITION TO PARCEL TAX PROPOSAL IF ACCOUNTABILTY
REQUIREMENTS AS WRITTEN ARE NOT REVISED TO ADDRESS MEMBERSHIP CONCERNS.
· MS GERBER DIRECTED UNANIMOUSLY BY UBC/MEMEBRS TO PRESENT THESE
CONCERNS AT UESF LOCAL 61 ASSEMBLY MEETING
· MANY STATED THEY WOULD NOT PARTICIPATE OR VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS
PROPOSAL IF THE ACCOUNTABILTY PROPOSAL IS NOT REVISED TO PROTECT
MEMBERS RIGHTS.
· J.GALGANO: COMMENDED NEW TEACHERS FOR REPRESENTING THEIR CONCERNS TO
SFUSD REVIEWERS WHO CAME TO GATHER THE INFORMATION, OPINIONS AND
CONCERNS OF THESE NEW TEACHERS.
· MEMBERS DISCUSSION ECHOED THAT ALL SITE MEMBERS ARE UPSET WITH THE
3RD PERIOD READING/ELECTIVE CLASS AS NOT ADDRESSING THE NEEDS AND
ABILTIES OF OUR DIVERS STUDENT POPULATION
· MEMBERS DISUSSION ALSO ECHOED THAT ALL MEMEBRS UNANIMOUSLY AGREE THAT
THE PRINCIPALÕS REFUSAL TO IMPLEMENT OUR AGREED TO IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION
ROOM IS PREVENTING US FROM ENFORCING CLASSROOM, SCHOOL AND SFUSD RULES
AS PREVIOUSLY AGREED TO. IT WAS ALSO SEEN AS ENCOURAGING STUDENTS TO
VIOLATE RULES WHEN NO CONSISTENT CONSEQUENNCES ARE PROVIDED DAILY.
· MANY MEMBERS DISCUSSED CONCERNS OVER LETTERS AND RUMORS BEING SPREAD
REGARDING THE IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION ROOM AND A CAMPUS SECURITY
SUPERVISOR. MANY EXPRESSED VOCAL SUPPORT FOR BOTH.
· J.GALGANO: STATED THE UBC AND BUILDING REPRESENTATIVE WILL CONTINUE
TO ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF ALL MEMEBRS WHOSE CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS BEING
VIOLATED TO ENSURE THEIR LIVES AND LIVELIEHOOD IS PROTECTED TO INSURE
THEY RECEIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS GUARANTEED UNDER CONTRACTUAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS, UNTIL A REOLUTION IS REACHED ACCORDINGLY.
· J.GERBER,M.MCACHREN,J.GALGANO:
· DISCUSSED HOW ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT JOAN HEPPERLY AND SANDRA LAM
STATED THEIR CONTINUED SUPPORT FOR ALTERNATIVES TO SUSPENSION SUCH AS
THE IN HOUSE SUSPENSION ROOM AND PEER COURT.
· MEMBER DISCUSSION AGREED THAT THESE BOTH NEEDED TO BE IMPLEMENTED
EFFECTIVELY AND CONSISTENTLY AT OUR SCHOOL SITE.
· MEMBERS CONTINUED TO DISCUSS THEIR SUPPORT FOR BLAINE WILSON, CAMPUS
SECURITY SUPERVISOR AND TO WORK TO SECURE HIS REINSTATEMENT.
· THE UBC REPRESENTATIVES CONTINUED TO STAE THEIR SUPPORT FOR MR WILSON
AND TO PROVIDE THEIR ADVOCACY TO PROMOTE A RESOLUTION ON HIS BEHALF.
· MEMBERS EXPRESSED CONCERNS ABOUT BEING CALLED INTO PRINCIAPLÕS OFFICE
UNDER VAGUE TOPICS AND THEN BEING MADE TO FEEL UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE
DIRECTION OF THE DISCUSSION.
· J.GALGANO: STATED EACH MEMEBR NEEDS TO BE INFORMED WHAT THEY ARE
BEING CALLED INTO THE OFFICE FOR AND THEIR RIGHT TO HAVE REPRESENTATION
AT THESES MEETINGS. ALL MEMBERS WERE ENCOURAGED TO USE THE UESF MEMO
CREATED BY ALLAN BRILL TO DETERMINE IF REPRESENTATION IS NEEDED.
· M.MCACHREN/J.GALGANO: URGED MEMEBRS TO COMPLETE AND TURN IN MASTER
SCHEDULE SURVEYS AND SITE PLAN INFORMATION GATHERING SURVEYS, TO CREATE
A SITE PLAN THROUGH THE SHARED DECISION MAKING PROCESS.
· C. MALTBY:RECORDER

2008 Budget Battle to Stop the Education Cuts
& Save Proposition 98!

Tell the Governor and our state representatives not to balance the
budget on the
|backs of our students and our schools!


Presidio Middle School teacher Armen Sedrakian writes to the Governor.


All UESF members are encouraged to send a letter and make a phone call
to Governor Schwarzenegger and our State legislators, demanding that
they fully fund our schools. Send the message that cutting California
schools by $4.8 billion dollars is unacceptable!

Letters are always best when written from a personal perspective,
detailing the effect the cuts would have on your classroom. Click here
for a one-page summary of where we stand, including how we can avoid
cutting our schools to the bone.

For more information, check out the CTA website, and the CFT website.
Contact List

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814

916-445-2841
916-558-3160 fax


Assemblyman Mark Leno
District 13
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0013
916-319-2013
916-319-2113 fax

455 Golden Gate Ave., Suite 14300
San Francisco, CA 94102
415-557-3013
415-557-3015 fax

Assemblywoman Fiona Ma
District 12
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0012
916-319-2012
916-319-2112 fax

455 Golden Gate Ave., Suite 14600
San Francisco, CA 94102
415-557-2312
415-557-1178

Senator Carol Migden
District 3
State Capitol, Room 5114
Sacramento, CA 95814
916-651-4003
916-445-4722

455 Golden Gate Ave., Suite 14800
San Francisco, CA 94102
415-557-1300
415-557-1252 fax


Senator Leland Yee
District 8
State Capitol, Room 4048
Sacramento, CA 95814
916-651-4008
916-327-2186 fax

455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14200
San Francisco, CA 94102
415-557-7857
415-557-7864 fax
UESF LOCAL 61 FEBRUARY MEETINGS:
February 27, 2008
COMMITTEE MEETINGS:
Middle School - 4:15 p.m.
Paraprofessionals - 4:30 p.m.

Sunday, February 10, 2008

uesf local 61 union building committee meeting february 11th, 2008 at 12:10pm in the library please attend and participate

>

UBC MEETING FEBRUARY 11TH,2008 AT 12:10PM IN THE LIBRARY

PLEASE ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING

TENTATIVE AGENDA:
A. SUMMARY OF UBC MEETING WITH DENNIS KELLY AND LINDA PLACK
B. READ AND DISCUSS MEMO FRO KELLY ON RAINY DAY FUNDS FOR SFUSD (see
below)****
C. OTHER MEMBERSHIP CONCERNS
PLEASE ATTEND 2/12/08 SSC MEETING 4:30PM TO SUPPORT IN IN SCHOOL
SUSPENSION ROOM AND DETENTION ROOM PROPOSALS PASSED UNANIMOUSLY AT OUR
UBC MEETINGS

FEBRUARY 25TH,2008 POTLUCK UBC MEETING :ALLAN BRILL UESF LOCAL 61 FIELD
REPRESENTATIVE WILL BE PRESENT TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS
***PLEASE BRING SOMETHING TO SHARE

UESF LOCAL 61 UNION BUILDING COMMITTEE MEETING: 2/4/08
SUMMARY:
MEMBERS PARTICIPATING: 22 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE
UBC REPRESENTATIVES AND ALTERNATES: REPS:
J.GERBER,C.MALTBY,L.WOOTEN,M.MCCACHREN,L.SCHUKNECHT,ALTS:
L.SPEARS,J.SHELDON,A.D.REYNOLDS,V.GONZALEZ
A. GALGANO/SCHUKNECHT WILL WORK ON CREATING A FACULTY/STAFF/UBC MASTER
SCHEDULE CALENDAR. PLEASE FILL OUT SURVEY TO BEGIN THIS PROCESS FOR
NEXT SCHOOL YEAR.
B. J.GERBER : SUMMARIZED THE UBC/ADM MEETINGS REGARDING THE DISCIPLINE
POLICY LANGUAGE CONCERNING TARDIES, CUTS, UNIFORMS AND REFERRALS
C. NO STUDENT WILL BE BANNED FROM THE COUNSELLING OFFICE ACCORDING TO
ADM
D. DISCUSSION REGARDING THE BULLETIN ON THE UNIFORM POLICY AND HOW IT
CONTRADICTED OUR CURRENT POLICY AND HOW THOSE WHO VIOLATE THE UNIFORM
POLICY CANNOT BE PENALIZED
E. REACTION FROM SFUSD IS SIMILAR TO THEIR OVERREACTING ON REQUIRING
SPECIAL ED TEACHERS IN MIDDLE SCHOOLS TO DO ITPÕS EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE
NOT REQUIRED TO AGE 16.
F. MANY FACULTY COMPLAINT THAT THE UNIFORM POLICY WOULD HAVE NO TEETH
AND BE UNENFORCEABLE
G. PARENTS USED TO HAVE TO SIGN CONTRACT ON FOLLOWING THIS UNIFORM
RULE, IT IS NO LONGER DONE AND NOTHING TO REQUIRE THEM TO DO THIS
H. GERBER:THIS UNDERMINES DISPLINE . IT SHOULD BE PART OF THE SITE PLAN
POLICY
I. MCCACHREN: THE UNIFORM POLICY CAME FROM THE PARENTS. PARENTS WANTED
IT THEN AND STILL DO
J. GALGANO: ACCORDING TO EDCODE DEVELOPING A UNIFORM POLICY IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SSC AND SHOULD BE PLACED IN THE SITE PLAN TO MAKE
IT BINDING.
K. REYNOLDS/GONZALEZ: THIS WAS A SITE DECISION MADE THROUGH THE PTSA
AND FACULTY AT THE SCHOOL SITE. IF WE ARE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO
ENFORC THIS WHY SHOULD WE BOTHER
L. GERBER: IF THE UNIFORM POLICY IS NOT GOING TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY OR
WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ENFORCE IT, THEN WE NEED TO DROP THE UNIFORM WE
NEED TO DISCUSS ON HOW TO RESOLVE THIS PROPOSAL SO IT IS ENFORCED
M. SHELDON: A LETTER SHOULD BE SENT TO THE PARENTS REGARDING THE
UNIFORMS
N. GALGANO: OUR AGREED UPON UNIFORM POLICY IS RELATIVELY THE SAME.
RIGHT NOW AS IT READS BLACK PANTS/SKIRTS AND WHITE SHIRTS AND BLOUSES
ARE REQUIRED. RED SWEATERS, HOODIES AND RED PULL OVERS ARE THE ONLY
OTHER COVERINGS PERMITTED. THE ONLY THING THAT HAS CHANGED IS THE
ENFORCEMENT AND CONSEQUENCES OF INFRACTIONS REGARDING THIS POLICY. I
HAVE TO AGREE WITH OTHER FACULTY IF WE ARE NOT GOING TO BE ALLOWED TO
ENFORCE THIS POLICY THEN WE SHOULD NOT HAVE A UNIFORM POLICY
O. GALGANO: THE UBC AND FACULTY CONTINUE TO ALMOST UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORT
AN IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION ROOM WITHOUT COUNSELORS. THE ADM IS PROPOSING
THEY STAFF IT OR SOMETHING LIKE IT 2 PERIODS A DAY .THIS SHOULD NOT
TAKE PEOPLE AWAY FROM THEIR REGULAR DUTIES . INSCHOOL
SUSPENSION/DETENTION OR CONSEQUENCE ROOM AS WE AGREED SHOULD NOT BE IN
THE COUNSELLING ROOM
P. SHELDON: SALZMAN SAID THAT HIS PROGRAM WOULD BE UNENFORCEABLE
WITHOUT AN IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION ROOM. THE ADM DOES NOT AGREE THAT IT IS
NEEDED OR TO DATE UNABLE TO IMPLEMENT ONE AND IT IS FEBRUARY ALREADY.
Q. GALGANO: MR WILSON CONTINUES TO NEED YOUR HELP TO BE RETURNED TO OUR
SITE PLEASE WRITE NEW LETTERS TO THE SCHOOL BOARD AND SIGN THE PETITION
IN SUPPORT OF HIS BEING RETURNED TO OUR SITE. WE ALSO MAY NEED TO GO
BEFORE THE SCHOOL BOARD TO SPEAK ON MR WILSONÕS BEHALF.PLEASE REMEMBER
STAFF ARE REQUIRED TO ATTEND 2/8/08 TRAINING UNLESS THEY HAVE A
DOCTORÕS SLIP.
********Rainy Day Fund Could Mean $30 Million for SF Schools
====================================================
Today Mayor Gavin Newsom announced his support for giving the SFUSD up
to $30 million from the cityÕs rainy day fund to offset the severe
education budget cuts proposed by Governor Schwarzenegger. The fund,
established in 2003 thanks to Supervisor Tom Ammiano, requires the city
to save a certain percentage of its revenue during good economic times.
It currently holds about $122 million, 25% of which can go to schools.

Superintendent Garcia has informed UESF that because of the budget
crisis, the district was anticipating sending out up to 500 layoff
notices. By law, these must be sent out by March 15th. However, the
mayor has pledged to work with the Board of Supervisors to avoid having
to send out the layoff notices.

In the event that layoff notices are sent out, we will make sure that
all contractual rights are enforced. Look for further information in the
coming days and weeks.

I would like to personally thank Supervisor Ammiano and Mayor Newsom for
their support of San FranciscoÕs public schools. The rainy day fund is
an example of what is meant by ÒSan Francisco Values,Ó taking care of
one another with foresight and compassion.

The fund can be accessed if the district receives less
inflation-adjusted per pupil funding from the state and if there would
otherwise be significant teacher layoffs. With the Governor announcing
up to $4.8 billion in education cuts across California, SFUSD is facing
a potential $40 million shortfall and now qualifies for the money.


UBC Training: Health & Safety Ð February 13
===========================================
Article 14 (teachersÕ contract) and Article 15 (paraprofessionalsÕ
contract) have powerful language that can benefit your school. Get an
overview of new contract language and the impact of the Williams
decision on SFUSD schools. This will be a hands-on workshop that will
prepare you for enforcing your UESF contract at your school site.

All UESF Building Reps, Union Building Committee members, and interested
activists are invited to attend the training.

The training will be held Wednesday, February 13 at Civic Center
Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave.) from 4:00-6:00 p.m. Parking is
available, accessible off of McAllister St. A light dinner will be
served.

Tutors Needed - $29-30 An Hour
==============================
Professional Tutors of America is looking for qualified tutors in all
academic subjects. In a special arrangement with UESF, all members will
earn $29-30 an hour for work done. You may also tutor one-to-one near
your home, and set your own schedule.

To apply, send your resume to resume@professionaltutors.com. You will
also eventually need to provide a copy of your bachelorÕs degree or
credential. For more information call 800-832-2487, ext.225.
United Educators of San Francisco
2310 Mason Street
San Francisco, CA 94133


> UESF LOCAL 61 MEETINGS FOR FEBRUARY 2008
> February 11, 2008
> Special Education Committee Meeting
> 4:15 p.m. @ Civic Center Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
> February 13, 2008
> UBC Training: Health & Safety
> 4:00 p.m. @ Civic Center Secondary School, Library (727 Golden Gate
> Ave. [map] [details])
> Student Support Services Committee Meeting
> 4:15 p.m. @ Hoover MS, Counseling Dept.
> (2290 14th Ave. [map])
> Professional Development Committee Meeting
> 4:15 p.m. @ Mann MS, Room 150
> (3351 23rd St. [map])
> February 15, 2008
> Iraq Moratorium Vigils - Throughout SF
> Times & Locations TBD [details]
> February 20, 2008
> Assembly Meeting
> 4:15 @ Civic Center Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
> February 25, 2008
> Joint UESF/SFUSD Special Education Committee Meeting
> 4:15 p.m. @ Civic Center Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
> February 27, 2008
> COMMITTEE MEETINGS:
> Elementary - 4:15 p.m.
> Middle School - 4:15 p.m.
> Paraprofessionals - 4:30 p.m.
> @ Civic Center Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
> UESF/COPE Parcel Tax Site Coordinator Training
> 6:00 p.m. @ Civic Center Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
> Wellness Coordinators Meeting
> 4:00 p.m. @ Civic Center Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
> [Contract Concerns] [Representation] [Due Process] [Just Cause]
>
> As an employee who is represented by United Educators of San
> Francisco, you have rights that you would not otherwise have. Below we
> will feature many of the rights from which you benefit because you're
> represented by UESF. We will add to this page as needed and requested.
> Please send your suggestions and questions to our webmaster.
>
> Workers' Comp: Protect rights to use your own doctor
> You have the right to use your own doctor immediately if you are
> injured on the job AND if you have filed a request with Benefits and
> Deduction. People who do not have such a form on record, must use the
> Workers Compensation medical facilities at San Francisco General, etc.
> for at least the first thirty days of treatment.
>
> Your letter to the SFUSD should state simply that you wish your doctor
> (name the person or health plan) to be your primary care provider in
> the event of a work-related injury. Deliver that letter to the
> Benefits and Deductions office of the SFUSD. Keep a date stamped copy
> for your records.
>
> Contract Concerns
>
> Seniority is key in para layoff procedure
>
> Sick Leave: Can your administrator put restrictions on your use of
> sick days or personal business days? Simply, NOT!
>
> We do not condone sick leave abuse, but no one can require a note from
> your doctor or your mother for a single day's absence. If your
> administrator makes such a demand, contact your Building Rep or the
> union office immediately.
>
> Five period workday: Full-time secondary teachers teach five periods
> and get one paid preparation period. Some teachers, particularly those
> at small high schools and those who teach special education day
> classes, have typically worked one of the five periods as counselors.
> If you teach in this situation, you should see your name as the
> "counselor" on the attendance sheets. If you are the counselor of
> record, your schedule should include a period for counselling.
>
> Employees' Rights to Representation in a Meeting: Weingarten
>
> If you have reason to believe that a meeting with your administrator
> will result in discipline, you have the right to have a union
> representative at that meeting. You must request to have your
> representative present because your administrator doesn't have to
> inform you of that right.
>
> If your administrator insists you meet without a representative, you
> must attend that meeting, but do not have to answer any questions. You
> cannot legally be disciplined for refusing to answer questions when
> you requested a union representative but were not allowed one. In such
> an instance, it is best to have put your request in writing.
>
> This right to have a union representative present in such meetings was
> established by the Supreme Court in the Weingarten case.
>
> Public Employees' Rights to Due Process: Skelly
>
> Public employees have due process protections on the job, as
> determined by the California Supreme Court. The result of rulings in
> the Skelly case, these are referred to as your Skelly rights.
>
> Public employees are entitled to a "pre-disciplinary hearing." An
> employee must be given a written notice of proposed disciplinary
> action. The notice must include:
> ¥ a statement of the nature of the proposed discipline
>
> ¥ the effective date of the proposed discipline
>
> ¥ the reasons for the discipline
>
> ¥ the specific policy or rule violated
>
> ¥ a statement about the right to respond orally or in writing.
>
> The purpose of the Skelly rule is to allow employees an opportunity to
> respond to the charges and to request a reduction or elimination of
> the discipline. It also allows for an opportunity to check out the
> evidence that management has against the employee.
> ***********************************************************************
> ******* SAFETY COMMITTEE SUMMARY 1/29/08
> ATTENDANCE:
> M.HARPER,C.SCERRI,A.D.REYNOLDS,N.POINDEXTER,V.GONZALEZ,B.SOUCH,S.CORRAL
> EJO,L.SPEARS,P.KOKA,C.FLORES,J.GALGANO
>
> 1. RED CROSS PODCAST/VIDEO AVAILABLE IN FACULTY LOUNGE TO VIEW
> 2. M.HARPER: UBC/ADM WILL REVIEW AND RESOLVE EMERGENCY STAFF
> DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING SCHEDULE.
> 3. PLEASE PROVIDE EMAILS TO MR HARPER WHERE HE CAN CONTACT OUR
> COMMITTEE WITH INFROMATION
> 4. REVIEW OF RED SUPPLY BAG:
> · ABLE TO HOLD SUPPLIES FOR 15 PERSONS FOR 1 DAY
> · OR SUPPLIES FOR 5 PEOPLE FOR 3 DAYS
> · MATERIALS GOOD FOR 5 YEARS
> · TABLETS TO PURIFY WATER
> SAFETY COMMITTEE:
> · WILL LOOK AT TRUNK AT ALL ITS SUPPLIES WHAT IS NEEDED
> · WHERE AND HOW TO TURN OFF GAS VALVE
> · SORTING PEOPLE INTO GROUPINGS REGARDING ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES
> AND TRAINING NEEDED
> · NERT TRAINING PART TWO WILL BE HELD, TIMES WILL BE SET FOR OTHERS TO
> GET THIS TWO DAY TRAINING.
> · PODCAST VIEWING AVAILABLE ON SITE
>
> NEXT SAFETY MEETINGS FOR FEBRUARY:
> A. FEBRUARY 4TH, 2008
> B. FEBRUARY 11TH,2008
> C. FEBRUARY 26TH,2008
>
>
>
>
>
>

Sunday, February 3, 2008

uesf local 61 union building committee meeting february 4th, 2008 at 12:10pm in the library please attend and participate

On Feb 3, 2008, at 3:38 PM, james Galgano wrote:


>
> UBC LUNCHTIME MEETING:::FEBRUARY 4TH, 2008
> IN THE LIBRARY AT 12:10PMÉ.PLEASE ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE
>
> TENTATIVE AGENDA:
> 1. UBC/ADM MEETINGS SUMMARIES
> 2. CREATING A CONSENSUS MASTER SCHEDULE FOR 2008-2009
> 3. SSC GOAL ONE REVISION EXERCISE
> 4. MEMBERSHIP CONCERNS AND UPDATES
>
> CAMPUS SECURITY GUARD BLAINE WILSON HAS EXPRESSED HIS THANKS TO ALL
> FACULTY , STAFF AND STUDENTS FOR THEIR SUPPORT AND LETTERS ON HIS
> BEHALF
>
> MR WILSON STILL NEEDS YOUR HELP PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION TO THE SFUSD
> SCHOOL BOARD AND CONTINUE TO WRITE YOUR INDIVIDUAL LETTERS OF SUPPORT
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> UBC MEETING SUMMARY É.JANUARY29TH,2008
> ATTENDING: 18 UESF MEMBERS THANK YOU
> UBC REPS/ALTERNATES:
> A.BROWN,D.WILLIAMS,L.SCHUKNECHT,D.BRYSON,M.MCCACHREN,C.MALTBY,L.WOOTEN:
> :: L.SPEARS,J.SHELDON
> 1. MSTLI UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE REVIEWED AND DISCUSSED
> 2. EVALUATION TIMELINE VIOLATIONS DISCUSSED
> 3. MIDDLE SCHOOL UNION AND PARAPROFESSIONAL UNION COMMITTEE MEETINGS
> WERE SUMMARIZED AND DISCUSSED
> 4. FACULTY AND STAFF REMINDED TO REPORT ALL ASSAULT, AND/OR ALLEGED
> CPS VIOLATIONS IMMEDIATELY
> 5. UBC WILL ONCE MORE TRY TO GET ADM TO REVIEW AND RESPOND TO 11/06/08
> PASSED SCHOOL WIDE DISCIPLINE PLAN TO REVIEW ,REVISE AND RESOLVE.
> 6. M.MCCACHREN: SUMMARY OF THE SSC SUMMIT
> A. CUTBACKS WERE DISCUSSED BUT NO SPECIFIC CUTBACKS FOR OUR SITE WERE
> DESCRIBED
> B. THE 2008-2009 SCHOOL SITE BUDGET WAS NOT PROVIDED TO THOSE WHO
> ATTENDED
> C. THERE WAS A DISCUSSION ABOUT GOING TO A THREE YEAR BUDGET PLAN ,BUT
> NOTHING SPECIFIC ON THIS
> D. IT WAS STATED THAT THERE WOULD BE NO CUTS FOR THIS YEAR, FUNDING
> FOR NEXT YEAR STILL NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNOR AND ASSEMBLY
> E. SCHOOL DISTRICT 40 MILLION SHORTFALL
>
> 7. EMERGENCY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION FORMS AND FACULTY/STAFF
> COMPLAINTS DISCUSSED REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY AND PASS BREACHING OF
> THIS CONFIDENTIALITY AT OUR SITE.
> 8. PARCEL TAX IN JUNE TO GET MONIES OUR DISTRICT NEEDSÉTHIS WILL BE A
> MUTUAL EFFORT BETWEEN UESF AND SFUSD
> 9. SAFETY COMMITTEE UPDATE: REVIEW OF DEVELOPING DISCUSSION ON TYPES
> OF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS TRAINING AND WHEN IT WILL BE PROVIDED.
> 10. A. D.WILLIAMS STATED FROM PARA UNION MEETING IT WAS STATED THAT
> PARAPROFESSIONAL MUST BE PART OF THIS TRAINING
> 11. IN REGARDS TO BUDGET CUTBACKS CONTRACT STIPULATES ALL AREAS MUST
> BE CUTBACK BEFORE STAFFING IS CONSIDERED.
> 12. LETTER FROM DEAN OF STUDENTS REVIEWED WILL BE DISCUSSED AFTER FULL
> INVESTIGATIONÉMEMBERS INFORMED UBC MEETINGS CAN ONLY BE HELD BEFORE
> SCHOOL HOURSÉIE: 7AM-8AM AND OR 4PM Ð5PM NOT DURING SCHOOL DAYÉMOST
> IF NOT ALL UBC MEETINGS THROUGHOUT DISTRICT ARE DURING LUNCHTIME.
> UESF LOCAL 61 MEETINGS FOR FEBRUARY 2008
>
> February 5, 2008
> Primary Election Day!
> [Labor Council Endorsements]
> February 6, 2008
> Executive Board Meeting
> 4:15 @ Civic Center Secondary School
> (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
> February 11, 2008
> Special Education Committee Meeting
> 4:15 p.m. @ Civic Center Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
> February 13, 2008
> UBC Training: Health & Safety
> 4:00 p.m. @ Civic Center Secondary School, Library (727 Golden Gate
> Ave. [map] [details])
> Student Support Services Committee Meeting
> 4:15 p.m. @ Hoover MS, Counseling Dept.
> (2290 14th Ave. [map])
> Professional Development Committee Meeting
> 4:15 p.m. @ Mann MS, Room 150
> (3351 23rd St. [map])
> February 15, 2008
> Iraq Moratorium Vigils - Throughout SF
> Times & Locations TBD [details]
>
>
> February 20, 2008
> Assembly Meeting
> 4:15 @ Civic Center Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
> February 25, 2008
> Joint UESF/SFUSD Special Education Committee Meeting
> 4:15 p.m. @ Civic Center Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
>
> February 27, 2008
> COMMITTEE MEETINGS:
> Elementary - 4:15 p.m.
> Middle School - 4:15 p.m.
> Paraprofessionals - 4:30 p.m.
> @ Civic Center Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
> UESF/COPE Parcel Tax Site Coordinator Training
> 6:00 p.m. @ Civic Center Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
> Wellness Coordinators Meeting
> 4:00 p.m. @ Civic Center Secondary School (727 Golden Gate Ave. [map])
> [Contract Concerns] [Representation] [Due Process] [Just Cause]
>
> As an employee who is represented by United Educators of San
> Francisco, you have rights that you would not otherwise have. Below we
> will feature many of the rights from which you benefit because you're
> represented by UESF. We will add to this page as needed and requested.
> Please send your suggestions and questions to our webmaster.
>
> Workers' Comp: Protect rights to use your own doctor
> You have the right to use your own doctor immediately if you are
> injured on the job AND if you have filed a request with Benefits and
> Deduction. People who do not have such a form on record, must use the
> Workers Compensation medical facilities at San Francisco General, etc.
> for at least the first thirty days of treatment.
>
> Your letter to the SFUSD should state simply that you wish your doctor
> (name the person or health plan) to be your primary care provider in
> the event of a work-related injury. Deliver that letter to the
> Benefits and Deductions office of the SFUSD. Keep a date stamped copy
> for your records.
>
> Contract Concerns
>
> Seniority is key in para layoff procedure
>
> Sick Leave: Can your administrator put restrictions on your use of
> sick days or personal business days? Simply, NOT!
>
> We do not condone sick leave abuse, but no one can require a note from
> your doctor or your mother for a single day's absence. If your
> administrator makes such a demand, contact your Building Rep or the
> union office immediately.
>
> Five period workday: Full-time secondary teachers teach five periods
> and get one paid preparation period. Some teachers, particularly those
> at small high schools and those who teach special education day
> classes, have typically worked one of the five periods as counselors.
> If you teach in this situation, you should see your name as the
> "counselor" on the attendance sheets. If you are the counselor of
> record, your schedule should include a period for counselling.
>
> Employees' Rights to Representation in a Meeting: Weingarten
>
> If you have reason to believe that a meeting with your administrator
> will result in discipline, you have the right to have a union
> representative at that meeting. You must request to have your
> representative present because your administrator doesn't have to
> inform you of that right.
>
> If your administrator insists you meet without a representative, you
> must attend that meeting, but do not have to answer any questions. You
> cannot legally be disciplined for refusing to answer questions when
> you requested a union representative but were not allowed one. In such
> an instance, it is best to have put your request in writing.
>
> This right to have a union representative present in such meetings was
> established by the Supreme Court in the Weingarten case.
>
> Public Employees' Rights to Due Process: Skelly
>
> Public employees have due process protections on the job, as
> determined by the California Supreme Court. The result of rulings in
> the Skelly case, these are referred to as your Skelly rights.
>
> Public employees are entitled to a "pre-disciplinary hearing." An
> employee must be given a written notice of proposed disciplinary
> action. The notice must include:
> ¥ a statement of the nature of the proposed discipline
>
> ¥ the effective date of the proposed discipline
>
> ¥ the reasons for the discipline
>
> ¥ the specific policy or rule violated
>
> ¥ a statement about the right to respond orally or in writing.
>
> The purpose of the Skelly rule is to allow employees an opportunity to
> respond to the charges and to request a reduction or elimination of
> the discipline. It also allows for an opportunity to check out the
> evidence that management has against the employee.
> ***********************************************************************
> ******* SAFETY COMMITTEE SUMMARY 1/29/08
> ATTENDANCE:
> M.HARPER,C.SCERRI,A.D.REYNOLDS,N.POINDEXTER,V.GONZALEZ,B.SOUCH,S.CORRAL
> EJO,L.SPEARS,P.KOKA,C.FLORES,J.GALGANO
>
> 1. RED CROSS PODCAST/VIDEO AVAILABLE IN FACULTY LOUNGE TO VIEW
> 2. M.HARPER: UBC/ADM WILL REVIEW AND RESOLVE EMERGENCY STAFF
> DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING SCHEDULE.
> 3. PLEASE PROVIDE EMAILS TO MR HARPER WHERE HE CAN CONTACT OUR
> COMMITTEE WITH INFROMATION
> 4. REVIEW OF RED SUPPLY BAG:
> · ABLE TO HOLD SUPPLIES FOR 15 PERSONS FOR 1 DAY
> · OR SUPPLIES FOR 5 PEOPLE FOR 3 DAYS
> · MATERIALS GOOD FOR 5 YEARS
> · TABLETS TO PURIFY WATER
> SAFETY COMMITTEE:
> · WILL LOOK AT TRUNK AT ALL ITS SUPPLIES WHAT IS NEEDED
> · WHERE AND HOW TO TURN OFF GAS VALVE
> · SORTING PEOPLE INTO GROUPINGS REGARDING ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES
> AND TRAINING NEEDED
> · NERT TRAINING PART TWO WILL BE HELD, TIMES WILL BE SET FOR OTHERS TO
> GET THIS TWO DAY TRAINING.
> · PODCAST VIEWING AVAILABLE ON SITE
>
> NEXT SAFETY MEETINGS FOR FEBRUARY:
> A. FEBRUARY 4TH, 2008
> B. FEBRUARY 11TH,2008
> C. FEBRUARY 26TH,2008
>
>
>
>
>
>

Friday, February 1, 2008

UBC LUNCHTIME MEETING.... MONDAY.....FEBRUARY 4TH , 2008 at 12:10pm in the library...please attend and participate....

UBC LUNCHTIME MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4TH,2008 AT 12:10PM IN THE
LIBRARY

PLEASE ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE

TENTATIVE AGENDA
A. REVIEW OF UBC/ADM MEETINGS
B. SCHOOL SITE PLAN REVISIONS
C. DEVELOPMENT OF MASTER SCHEDULE
D. UNION UPDATES
E. MEMBERSHIP CONCERNS

CAMPUS SECURITY GUARD BLAINE WILSON HAS EXPRESSED HIS THANKS TO ALL
FACULTY , STAFF AND STUDENTS FOR THEIR SUPPORT AND LETTERS ON HIS
BEHALF

************************************************************************
***************************************************************
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Academic Middle School

School Site Council Bylaws

ARTICLE I: Name

The name of this council shall be the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Academic Middle School Site Council. It will be' commonly referred to
here and elsewhere as "the SSC".

ARTICLE II: Role & Domain of Authority

The role of this council is to:

a) oversee the long term policy and planning processes for the school.

b) mediate and resolve disagreements between participating
constituencies.

Appendix A of these Bylaws describes the "domains of authority" of the
SSC and its' various constituencies in more detail.

ARTICLE III: Membership

The membership of the MLK SSC is structured as follows, for a total of
16 members:
1 administrator, specifically the Principal, unless otherwise agreed.
5 teachers - election supervised by the Union Building Committee (UBC)
1 paraprofessional - election supervised by the UBC
1 classified (SEIU) employee – election supervised by SEIU Building
Committee
5 parents (election process determined by the PTSA)
3 students (1 per grade level, election process determined by the
Student Body)

In addition to the above, each constituency should select an
appropriate number of "alternates" who can be asked to substitute for a
member(s) who is unable to attend a specific meeting.

ARTICLE IV: Responsibilities; Voting, & Attendance

a) Each member of the SSC acts as a representative of his/her
constituency and speaks and votes on behalf of the constituency

b) Each member is accorded one vote on, the SSC. Only legitimate
members and alternates who are present at a meeting may vote.

c) Each SSC member must be ready and prepared to meet monthly (more
often if
needed) from October through June of the school year. The term of
office will be 2 years, as determined by the individual constituency.

d) In the event a member is unable to complete the term of office, the
constituency must select a new member within one month of notification
of the vacancy.

e) If a member misses three consecutive monthly SSC meetings, the
constituency may select, a new member for that position.

f) Each SSC meeting will also be open to the general school community.
Everyone attending may participate in discussions, unless restrictions
are pre-arranged by a 2/3 vote of the SSC. However, only official
members/alternates may cast votes when decisions are made.

g) The responsibilities of the SSC shall include the development,
creation, and approval of an Academic Site Plan and Budget for each
subsequent school year.

h) The responsibilities of the SSC shall also include monitoring of the
current Academic Site Plan and Budget for each school year to promote
effective implementation. Any changes deemed significant by an SSC
constituency can be brought to the attention of the SSC. (NOTE: This
does not mean the SSC needs to approve/disapprove specific expenditures
of previously approved budget allocations. However, an SSC member can
ask to have a specific expenditure reviewed if there's a concern about
its appropriateness.)

i) No materials or equipment purchased with funds monitored by the SSC
shall be released for use by another school site without approval by
the SSC.


ARTICLE V: Officers

a) The SSC shall, at the first meeting of each year, elect a
Chairperson and a Secretary. If either person is absent at any
subsequent meeting, a temporary replacement will be selected for the
duration of the meeting.

b) The chairperson's duties shall include:
1. Gathering, posting, and setting the agenda for each meeting.
2. Notifying, in accordance with State legislative and local
ordinances, both SSC members and the school community of the date and
time of each meeting and the preliminary agenda.
3. Presiding over each meeting in a way that insures the effective and
efficient conduct of the SSC's business.

c) The Secretary's duties shall include:
1. Taking accurate notes of the business conducted at each meeting.

2. Preparing an official set of "minutes" describing the business and
events, of each meeting.

3. Distributing these "minutes" to each SSC member as soon as possible
following each meeting, and also posting a copy for the school
community. .

4. Presenting the "minutes" of the previous meeting at each SSC meeting
for review, possible correction, and approval by the SSC.

d) If the Chairperson or Secretary misses three consecutive monthly
meetings during the school year, or is found by a 2/3 vote of the SSC
to be negligent in his/her duties, a replacement will be considered.

ARTICLE VI: Committees

a) The SSC may as needed establish standing or special committees. Such
committees will make recommendations for action to the SSC, but the
decision-making authority still rests with the SSC.

b) Membership in such committees will be established by the SSC, and
may include non-SSC members. However each committee must include at
least one SSC teacher member and one SSC parent member.

c) Each committee may adopt rules for its own governance, so long as
they are not
inconsistent with these SSC Bylaws.

d) Unless otherwise stated by the SSC, a Committee's. "quorum" business
'is designated as a "majority" of its members.

e) Vacancies in a committee will be filled by a process to be
determined by the SSC.

f) Each year the elected cabinet for the English Learners Advisory
Committee (ELAC) will also serve as a "Standing Committee" of the SSC,
to advise the SSC. They will be asked to submit recommendations to be
taken by the SSC on their behalf.


ARTICLE VII: SCC Meetings

a) The SSC shall meet at 4:30 PM on the second Tuesday of each month
unless a different date is set in advance with the agreement of a
majority of the SSC members.

b) Additional meetings may be called by the Chairperson (under
"emergency" situations) or by a majority vote of the, SSC.

c) The meetings will be held in the library, unless expected attendance
warrants relocating to a larger space.

d) Votes can be taken only if a "quorum" is present. A quorum will
consist of 9 or more SSC members.

e) Meetings will be conducted according to "Robert's Rules Of Order",
except as specified elsewhere in these Bylaws.


ARTICLE VIII: Agenda Process

Items will placed on the SSC agenda by the following process:

1. At the end of each meeting, a preliminary agenda will be set for the
next meeting by a majority of SSC members, consisting of unfinished
business and/or new items raised by members.

2. Between meetings, new items can be submitted by SSC members to the
Chairperson, who will then add the item to the preliminary agenda.

3. New items can also be raised by SSC members at the beginning of
each meeting.

4. The SSC as a whole can then decide the feasibility of including each
new item on the meeting's agenda.


ARTICLE IX: Decision & Appeal Processes

a) Consensus on decisions will be sought at all times. If consensus
can't be reached, the SSC will then determine the best course of action
for dealing with the particular issue.

b) All agenda items shall be made known to each SSC member at least
five days in advance of each meeting, to enable members to seek input
from their constituencies. This will expedite a decision being reached
rather than "tabled".

c) Any decision made by the SSC will be official and cannot be negated
by any other person or group unless it is contrary to Federal, State,
or District regulations and policies.

d) The timing and implementation of SSC decisions will be determined by
the SSC, and will be included in the wording of the official decision.

e) Any decision made by the SSC can be appealed by any member
constituency by:
1. Placing the issue again on the next available agenda.
2. At that SSC meeting, the constituency's concern with the decision
will be
stated and will be followed by further discussion and/or another
vote.

ARTICLE X: Amendments

This set of SSC Bylaws can be amended by the following process:

1. Amendments are made by placing the proposed changes before a full
meeting of the SSC membership.

2. Ample time is allowed for each constituency to discuss the merits of
the proposed amendment.

3. Amendments must not contravene current Federal, State, or District
regulations
and policies.

4. Amendments are ratified through a consensus of members present. If
consensus cannot be reached, the amendment may be tabled, or sent to a
sub-committee for further revision and resolution. Amendments can then
be approved with a 3/4th vote of the full SSC membership.

Appendix A

MLK SSC DOMAINS (And Decision-making Groups)

SSC Domain: Long term policy and planning decisions. Also includes
final site approval of all program Budgets and Master Schedule

Administrative Domain: All decisions regarding enforcement of
SFUSD/CA/USA mandated regulations & procedures. Also all "emergency"
decisions needed due to time constraints.

UESF Staff Domain: All decision-making activities and roles specified
in the UESF Contract, including (but not limited to) concurrence on the
common planning time schedule and the goal of shared consensus with
administration on areas of curriculum, budget, scheduling, staffing,
assignment, and professional development.

SEIU Domain: (Specific language to be arranged with SEIU Building
Representative)

Parents Domain: All decisions related to PTSA policies, activities, and
its budget. Voting membership in SSC, BAC, SAC, and FLU. Also
includes decisions relegated to parents by SFUSD or CA, such as the
decision on uniforms.

Student Body Domain: All decisions regarding the expenditure of
student raised monies, co-approval of fundraising activities, and
co-approval of Graduation, dances, and other student-sponsored
activities.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Question: My principal just established a 'Leadership Team' at my
school.
What should I expect from this new team? What are my rights?
Answer: 'Leadership Teams' are
entirely a creature of the district,
the duties and responsibilities of
which were never bargained with
UESF. What we have seen so far
is that 'Leadership Teams' have
been established to advise the
principal on various areas including
curriculum, student assessment,
and grant implementation.
Many members have contacted
UESF, concerned that 'Leadership
Teams' are doing more than
advising – they are acting as
quasi-management, decision-making
bodies. If so, then we have a
problem.
Because the establishment of
the 'Leadership Teams' was not
bargained with UESF, they have
no authority to determine any
changes in working conditions.
Furthermore, a 'Leadership Team'
can in no way usurp the rights of
the Union Building Committee.
We have also received some
reports that Leadership Teams are
composed of hand-picked staff,
with the obvious intention of
undermining the UBC. This is a
serious violation of the
UESF/SFUSD contract.
Some important things to
remember when considering a
'Leadership Team' if one has been
established at your school site:
• You have the right to refuse to
participate in a 'Leadership
Team.' You cannot be negatively
evaluated if you choose not
to be on a 'Leadership Team.'
• The Union Building Committee
and the Building Representative
are the representatives of UESF
at the school site. Under the
contract, principals are
required to share information
and ideas with the goal of
achieving consensus on site
operations and policy, including
staffing, assignment, programming,
facilities management
and planning, staff development,
and budgeting (Article
25.3.7).
• 'Leadership Teams' can discuss
any issues they please, but they
cannot make decisions outside
of a narrow range of items that
are completely under the
purview of the principal. The
Union Building Committee
must be consulted if any site
operations or policy changes at
the school are to be considered.
• Members of a 'Leadership
Team' have no authority at the
school site. They are in no way
supervisors or evaluators of
others' work.
• New meetings and meeting
times must be scheduled with
the concurrence of the UBC
(Article 7.2.7)
• Leadership teams can't implement
proposed district policy
at the site level. Any new district
initiatives or proposals
must go through the UBC.
• UESF suggests that 'Leadership
Team' reports be made at
monthly UBC/administration
meetings.
If a 'Leadership Team' has
overstepped its advisory role, it is
important that you bring the
matter up with your Building
Representative, and discuss the
issue with your UBC. If you are
concerned that your 'Leadership
Team' has been established with
the intention of undermining
your UBC or Building
Representative, contact UESF
immediately at 956-8373.
UESF Requests More Information on
District "Equitable Education for all
Middle School Students" Proposal
On November 13, 2007 UESF
President Dennis Kelly sent a letter to
Joan Hepperly, the SFUSD Assistant
Superintendent of Middle Schools,
seeking more information on the new
district proposal, "Equitable Education
for all Middle Schools."
The proposal includes the establishment
of a seventh period as a pilot program
in a few middle schools.
However, it was unclear whether the
extra period would be established for
the purpose of adding another numeracy
or literacy section or whether electives
would be added.
UESF is very much interested in making
middle schools more successful
institutions for learning. However, if
proposed reforms support more 'drilland-
kill' approaches, UESF cannot support
such measures.
Of course, any lengthening of the
school day is a mandatory subject of bargaining,
and therefore cannot be unilaterally
implemented by the district. If you
have any concerns about such a program,
please attend the next Middle
School Committee meeting, or contact
UESF Middle School representative Allan
Brill at abrill@uesf.org. At press time
President Kelly's letter had received no
response.
Principal's Expectations Cannot Be
Used in the Evaluation Process
According to the UESF contract only the
California Standards for the Teaching
Profession can be used during teacher
evaluations. However, some SFUSD principals
have informed their staff that they
will use their Principal Expectations during
the evaluation process.
This is a clear violation of the contract,
and represents a unilateral change in the
conditions of work. If your principal has
indicated that he wishes to use Principal
Expectations during your next evaluation,
contact UESF immediately at 956-
8373.
Paraprofessionals – Remember to
Use your Paid Family Leave Benefit
In 2002, with the help of the labor
movement, the Paid Family Leave (PFL)
Law was enacted in California. PFL provides
workers with a maximum of six
weeks of partial pay each year while taking
time off from work to bond with a
newborn baby, newly adopted or foster
child, or to care for a seriously ill parent,
child, spouse, or registered domestic
partner.
Paraprofessionals and other workers
who pay into the State Disability
Insurance (SDI) Program are eligible for
this benefit. SFUSD teachers do not pay
into SDI and are therefore not eligible.
PFL benefits will replace approximately
55% of wages up to a maximum of
$882.
The PFL program is 100% employeefunded,
and is currently over-funded,
meaning that people who are entitled to
the benefit are not taking advantage of
the program.
Certain conditions apply. Go to the
UESF website at www.uesf.org, and click
on 'Forms and Documents' for a link to
the claim form and more information
about the program. Additional forms are
also available at the UESF office.

United Educators of San Francisco, California

• District and union working together to reduce the need for
reconstitution by implementing a standards-based accountability system
• Restructured schools will use one of three options for operating
shared decision making programs
• Restructuring will not be imposed but allowed to evolve on a
voluntary basis
• Labor and management serve on the restructuring council to develop
goals/procedures for restructuring, promote site-based decision-making,
and provide guidance on restructuring plans.